Legal Opinion
Fiore v. Associated Transport, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1966No. Civ. 8874PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.
These are motions by the defendants, Associated Transport, Inc. (Associated), The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (International), and General Drivers & Helpers Local Union 229 (Local 229), an affiliate of International, to dismiss the complaint, or in the alternative, to stay the proceedings. 1 Jurisdiction is based on Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 185. Plaintiffs, members of Local 229, brought the action pursuant to. Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Leo Desrosiers v. American Cyanamid Company, and International Chemical Workers Union a.f.l.-c.i.o. Local No. 436Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Turley v. Hall's Motor Transit CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Margetta v. Pam Pam CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Chapman v. Southeast Region I. L. G. W. U. Health & Welfare Recreation FundDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.