Legal Opinion

Turley v. Hall's Motor Transit Company

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1969No. Civ. 68-397PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.

This is a ruling on motion by defendant, Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Local Union No. 776, to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Plaintiffs, all of whom were formerly employed by defendant, Accelerated Transport-Pony Express, Inc., are presently employed by Hall’s Motor Transit Company. While employed by Pony at Hagerstown, Maryland, they were members of and represented by Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Local Union No. 992. Since their employment by Hall’s, they are apparently now represented by 776. Jurisdiction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Hardcastle v. Western Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  5. Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
  2. Sciaraffa v. Oxford Paper CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1992
  3. Bernstein v. IDT Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
  4. Boddorff v. Publicker Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Birrane v. Master Collectors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API