Legal Opinion
Margetta v. Pam Pam Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 7, 1973No. C-72-2057PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RENFREW, District Judge.
Karen Margetta brought this action in two counts against her former employer, Pam Pam Corporation (“Pam Pam”), her former union, Waitresses’ Cafeteria and Dairy Lunch Girls Workers Union, Local 48 (“Waitresses’ Union”), Waiters & Dairy Lunch Men’s Union Local No. 30 (“Waiters’ Union”), and San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, Bartenders and Hotel, Motel and Club Service Workers (“Joint Board”). In her first cause of action she charges Pam Pam with discharging her without sufficient cause in violation of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- Hardcastle v. Western Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Viola McKinney v. Lee E. De BordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Holodnak v. AVCO CORP., AVCO-LYCOMING D., STRATFORD, CONN.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- Karen Margetta v. Pam Pam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Marietta v. Cities Service Oil Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
- Hansel v. Parker Seal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.