Legal Opinion

Turoczy Bonding Co. v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Decided August 9, 2018No. 106494PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Donnell Mitchell, appeals from the trial court's judgment granting the motion to enforce a settlement agreement filed by plaintiff-appellee, Turoczy Bonding Company. Mitchell raises the following assignments of error for review:

1. The trial court erred in granting appellee's motion to enforce a settlement agreement because it is against the manifest weight of the evidence.

2. The trial court erred in granting appellee's motion to enforce a settlement agreement as contrary to well established case law of the state of Ohio.

3. The trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Rulli v. Fan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Perlmuter Printing Co. v. Strome, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
  4. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Mack v. Polson Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & GambelOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Widok v. Estate of WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Cleveland Cent. Catholic High Sch. v. Mills, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  4. Al-Zubi v. Cosmetic & Implant Dental Ctr. of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Pollock v. Trustar Funding, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API