Legal Opinion

In re Ballentine

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 2013No. 7 JD 13PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam 1

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2013, based upon the Opinion filed herewith, it is hereby ORDERED:

That, pursuant to C.J.D.R.P. No. 503, the attached Opinion with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be and it is hereby filed, and shall be served upon the Judicial Conduct Board and upon the Respondent;

That, either party may elect to file written objections to the conclusions of the Court, stating therein the basis for those objections, provided that such objections shall be filed with the Court within ten (10) days of the date of the entry of this Order, and a copy thereof served upon…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. In Re SmithCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. In Re CicchettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. In Re JoyceCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re SullivanCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. In Re Angeles Roca First Judicial District Philadelphia CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. In Re: Angeles Roca, JudgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. In re BallentineCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API