Legal Opinion

Columbia Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Ingraham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 1995No. 94-1162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Trehlan Ingraham, the appellee, applied for casualty insurance to be provided by the appellant, Columbia Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (Columbia), for a residence he owned. He did so at the Rowe Insurance Agency in Farmington where he was assisted by Ms. Spears, an agency employee. The application form Mr. Ingraham signed included a 30-day binder. He gave Ms. Spears a check for the premium covering one year. Columbia rejected the application within the 30-day period and so informed the Rowe Agency which did not inform Mr. Ingraham of the rejection. Some 56 days…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance Companies v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Dodds v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Holland v. Interstate Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Ingram v. WirtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Dixie Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. HammSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mashburn v. Meeker Sharkey Financial Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Simmons Foods, Inc. v. H. Mahmood J. Al-Bunnia & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Kenning v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1997
  4. Langford v. WilkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2015
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Alliance Insurance Group of Arkadelphia, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API