Legal Opinion
Langford v. Wilkins
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided April 21, 2015No. Case No. 3:12-cv-00111 KGBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court are several motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Jimmy Wilkins, in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Hughes School District No. 27 (collectively “HSD”). The. HSD has filed motions for summary judgment against the claims of plaintiffs Phyllis Langford (Dkt. No. 88), Michael Manning (Dkt. No. 97), and Dovie Wolf (Dkt. No. 91). Ml of these plaintiffs have responded in opposition to the respective motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. Ill, 115, 113), and the HSD has replied to each of these responses…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harold Reynolds, (Trip) v. Vicki Kramer, Director, Nebraska Department of Transportation; and David Davis, US Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2026
- Seals v. State of Nebraska-Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2024