Legal Opinion

Holland v. Interstate Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 13, 1958No. 5-1580PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an action by the appellants to recover $1,300 upon two fire insurance policies, by which the appellee insured a dwelling house and household goods. The insurer denied liability on the ground that, in violation of the terms of the policies, the house had been vacant for more than sixty days at the time of the fire. At the close of the proof the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant.

Since it is conceded that the dwelling had been vacant for some six months when it burned, the trial court’s action was correct unless there was substantial evidence from which the jury might have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. ClickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. German-American Insurance v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. ForlinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. American Insurance v. HornbargerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance Companies v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. McGann v. Hobbs Lumber CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mashburn v. Meeker Sharkey Financial Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Dodds v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Kay B. Jackson v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API