Legal Opinion

State v. Godwin.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1905PublishedCited by 23 opinions

INDICTMENT against Elijah Godwin, heard by Judge G. 8. Ferguson and a jury, at the February Term, 1904, of the-Superior Court of Lenoik County. The defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with a violation of section 1761 of The Code, which makes it unlawful for a tenant to destroy, deface, injure or damage any tenement house of his landlord. He was convicted and appealed from the judgment pronounced.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

There was evidence tending to show that one Alexander Tilghman was the owner of the land and had sold the timber to Charles Riley & Co., with the privilege of building tram roads, saw mills, etc., necessary and incidental to cutting, hauling and manufacturing lumber, and that Biley & Co., through Hines Bros., contracted with J. H. Hines to cut, haul, saw and remove said timber; that said Hines, with the permission of said Tilghman, went on the land and located the mill and constructed buildings for the purpose of said work, and among others, the building described in the indictment, which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. Willoughby v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. . LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. State v. . NolandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . SnipesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API