Legal Opinion

Lee Chu v. Noar

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

This is a bill in equity "wherein it is averred that the. complainants and the respondent are the owners, as tenants in common, of a certain piece of land situate on the comer of Fort and Kukui- Streets in this city and also of a certain lease of another piece of land situate on Fort Street and adjoining that first described; that the interests of the parties are, respectively, one fourth, five sixteenths, and seven sixteenths; that the parties desire to have a partition of the iiroperty but that the. same *649is incapable of a fair and just partition. The prayer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Lake v. TyreeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
  3. Green v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Foster v. BowmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Stevens v. McCormickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pioneer Mill Co. v. WardHawaii Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kalanianaole v. Liliuokalani ex rel. AndrewsHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  3. In re ScottHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Focke v. GayHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pioneer Mill Co. v. WardHawaii Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API