Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Latimer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 2011No. SCBD 5496PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, J.;

T1 In its second amended petition in this Rule 6 proceeding, 1 the complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association, charged the respondent, Caesar Cooleridge Latimer (Latimer/attorney), with five counts of professional misconduct. Charges involved: incompetent representation of multiple clients; failure to communicate with those clients; misrepresentations to clients, district court personnel, and to this tribunal; and failure to respond to grievance/disciplinary inquiries. 2

12 The grievance system exists to protect the public. It is this Court's responsibility to see that it is upheld…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  3. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API