STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Latimer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, J.;
T1 In its second amended petition in this Rule 6 proceeding, 1 the complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association, charged the respondent, Caesar Cooleridge Latimer (Latimer/attorney), with five counts of professional misconduct. Charges involved: incompetent representation of multiple clients; failure to communicate with those clients; misrepresentations to clients, district court personnel, and to this tribunal; and failure to respond to grievance/disciplinary inquiries. 2
12 The grievance system exists to protect the public. It is this Court's responsibility to see that it is upheld…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023