Legal Opinion
United States v. Cortrayer Zone
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 2005No. 03-10361PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE.
2Per curiam
Cortrayer Zone appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal indictment. He argues that the instant federal prosecution violates his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause because federal prosecutors orchestrated a previous state plea agreement in order to obtain a sworn admission for use in the federal proceedings. Because Zone has produced no evidence that “the state in bringing its prosecution was merely a tool of the federal authorities,” United States v. Figueroa-Soto, 938 F.2d 1015, 1019 (9th…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. BhatiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Hector Ruben Lopez, A/K/A Hector Ruben Pirate, Ruben Hector, Ruben "Pirate" Lopez-HectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- H&H Avionics, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- United States v. Joshua LucasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.