Legal Opinion

Drexler v. Koza

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1950No. Civ.A. 3009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

This is the final phase of a hard fought patent suit. The patent in suit was held valid and infringed by decree of this court entered November 5, 1945, 62 F.Supp. 473, and affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 3 Cir., 156 F.2d 370. Certiorari was denied 329 U.S. 771, 67 S.Ct. 189, 91 L.Ed 664. Rehearing was likewise denied 329 U.S. 831, 67 S.Ct. 367, 91 L.Ed 704. A reference was then made to a master to state an account of profits derived from the infringement. Exceptions by the defendant to the master’s report are now before us for disposition.

The principal question…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Wood v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1924
  3. Bereslavsky v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
  4. Drexler v. KozaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. Drexler v. KozaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. Watkins-Johnson CEI DivisionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
  2. Consolidated Vacuum Corp. v. MacHine Dynamics, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1964
  3. Systron-Donner Corp. v. Palomar Scientific Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API