Legal Opinion

Bereslavsky v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 1, 1949No. Civil Action 2300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Judge.

This is a suit under R.S. 4919, 35 U.S. C.A. § 67, to recover damages for the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,713,589, issued to plaintiff for an invention in fuels for internal combustion engines. Defendant has moved under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for a summary judgment as to an important part of the plaintiff’s claim. The question presented by this motion is the only question now before the Court. For the purposes of the motion the material facts have been stipulated by the parties and the question for decision is solely one of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. StrangSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. Watkins-Johnson CEI DivisionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
  2. Drexler v. KozaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API