Legal Opinion
Molinaro v. Watkins-Johnson CEI Division
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 9, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 72-589PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHROP, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Edward T. Molinaro and Anthony P. Catanzaro, are representing themselves in this patent case, and claim that certain devices manufactured by Watkins-Johnson CEI Division — the MD-104 Auto-Scan Receiver and a modification kit for field conversion of any RS-111-1B Series Receiving System into an RS-111-1B-17 — infringe Molinaro’s Patent No. 2,906,875 for a Station Sampling Radio. Defendant challenges the jurisdiction of this Court and also states in its answer that the patent is invalid and not infringed.
Defendant’s brief offers a detailed description of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Stevens v. Howard D. Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- In Re: Bertram ZweibonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Goodman v. PolandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Carrier Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Schoonfield v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.