Legal Opinion
Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of Nursing
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 21, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 89-0132PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROLL, Presiding Judge.
Appellants Phyllis Ethridge, Bettie Mazel, and Mildred Eaves appeal from the superior court’s review of the Arizona Board of Nursing’s disciplinary action. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and vacate in part.
FACTS
Phyllis Ethridge, Bettie Mazel, Mildred Eaves, and three other individuals are nurses licensed by the State of Arizona and employed at Carondelet St. Mary’s Hospital and Health Center (St. Mary’s). Ethridge is the nursing director, Mazel is the unit director of the burn unit, and Eaves is a staff nurse on the burn unit. The three other…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- DeGroot v. Arizona Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Romo v. KirschnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.