Legal Opinion
Romo v. Kirschner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 17, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 93-0140PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Presiding Judge.
The dispositive question in this appeal is whether a $150,000 trust fund is a resource which disqualifies the trust beneficiary from indigent health care.
The conservator for Manuel M. Romo, Jr. brings this appeal from a superior court judgment affirming an administrative decision which had denied Mr. Romo eligibility for long term nursing care benefits. The administrative decision was made by the Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration (“AHCCC-SA”), which administers indigent health care benefits. The- superior court ruled…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Eshelman v. BlubaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Forsyth v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Capitol Castings, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Miller v. IbarraDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cohen v. Commissioner of the Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Forino v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Williams Ex Rel. Squier v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Sanderson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.