Legal Opinion

Prelude, Inc. v. Jorcyk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1997PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

We quash this appeal. In recognition of our disposition, we relate only so much of the history and facts as are necessary to explain our position. Appellani/Plaintiffs are Wald-man, Madric, & Febles who are principal officers and employees of appellant Prelude, Inc. Defendants are Barbary Coast,II, Inc. and M. Dolores Jorcyk its only shareholder, as well as attomeys-at-law Rubini and Scheetz and Williams & Scheetz, P.C., a law firm. Appellees are the lawyer and law firm defendants.

Appellants leased a restaurant and bar and, by addendum, a liquor license in New Hope,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maritime Electric Co. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. ROBERT H. McKINNEY, JR. v. AlbrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Continental Bank v. Andrew Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Bonner v. FayneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Bell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. CulsoirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Brickman Group, Ltd. v. CGU Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Pullman Power Products of Canada Ltd. v. Basic Engineers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. McNeal v. Eaton Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API