Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Cluggish

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1896No. 17,334PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Hackney, O. J.

This .was a suit by the appellees, Bobert Cluggish, as commissioner of drainage, and Frederick J. Smith, contractor for the construction of an extensive drain, including the dredging of Buck creek, in Henry and Delaware bounties, to enjoin the appellant from interfering with and preventing the appellees in the prosecution of said work, from taking from the bed of said stream, within the line of said work, a bent supporting, in part, a wooden bridge of the appellant spanning said stream, and in so far breaking the span of said bridge as to permit the dredge, employed ip. said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Cooke v. Boston and Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Voss v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. People ex rel. GrimwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Huntington v. Northern Indiana Power Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Vandalia Railroad v. State ex rel. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API