Legal Opinion

State v. Rogan

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1999No. 21908PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RAMIL, J.

Defendant-appellant Jerome Rogan appeals from the circuit court’s judgment, guilty conviction and sentence, and notice of entry filed on August 26,1998. A jury found Rogan guilty of four counts of sexual assault in the third degree, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-732(l)(b) (1993). 1 On appeal, Rogan contends that: (1) the circuit court erred in failing to grant his motion for mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct; and (2) HRS eh. 846E violates various protections afforded by the United States and Hawaii Constitutions. For the reasons…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. State v. ValdiviaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. CordeiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. KlingeHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HaugeHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API