Glover v. Grace Pacific Corp.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ACOBA, Judge.
We hold in this appeal by Plaintiff-Appellant William D. Glover, Jr. (Glover) that while an order may condition Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 37(b) sanctions on the offending party’s failure to satisfy a condition contained in the order, the order in the instant case was not enforceable because the condition that Glover “reschedule” an independent medical examination (IME) with a physician retained by Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee Grace Pacific Corporation (Grace) was imposed after the time set for satisfying the condition had already expired.
We also…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Kernan v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Hardy v. RiserDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
- Daval Steel Products v. M/V FakredineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Child Support Enforcement Agency v. RoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Stender v. VincentHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Weinberg v. DICKSON-WEINBERGHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- Engle v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
- Mock v. CastroHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.