Legal Opinion

Glover v. Grace Pacific Corp.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1997No. 18317PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACOBA, Judge.

We hold in this appeal by Plaintiff-Appellant William D. Glover, Jr. (Glover) that while an order may condition Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 37(b) sanctions on the offending party’s failure to satisfy a condition contained in the order, the order in the instant case was not enforceable because the condition that Glover “reschedule” an independent medical examination (IME) with a physician retained by Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee Grace Pacific Corporation (Grace) was imposed after the time set for satisfying the condition had already expired.

We also…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Kernan v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hardy v. RiserDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
  5. Daval Steel Products v. M/V FakredineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Child Support Enforcement Agency v. RoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stender v. VincentHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Weinberg v. DICKSON-WEINBERGHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Engle v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
  5. Mock v. CastroHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API