Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kernan v. Tanaka

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1993No. 15908, 15906 and 15905PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KLEIN, J.

Petitioners-Appellants Charles Kernan (Kernan), Paul Stewart (Stewart), and Jeton Allen (Allen) (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from a district court order affirming their license revocations pursuant to Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) chapter 286, Part XIV. (Supp. 1992) (Administrative Revocation Program). Each Appellant was separately arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) in violation of HRS § 291-4 1 (Supp. 1992) and given a notice of administrative revocation.

The Administrative Revocation Program sets out the rules and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API