Linn v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to determine whether or not a peremptory writ should issue, directing the respondent Judge of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, to permit the petitioner to withdraw as attorney of record in a pending action. This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation of the facts from which it appears that Otto & Linn were attorneys for Louzena K. Bewley from November 3, 1923, until July 29, 1925, at which time Roy A. Linn, the petitioner, was substituted as sole counsel for Louzena K. Bewley; that during…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Branch v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- McInnes v. SuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- De Recat Corp. v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People ex rel. Coon v. Plymouth Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Lee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. McCrackenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cascella v. Jay James Camera Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- People v. PrinceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Finch v. WALLBERG DREDGING COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Manfredi & Levine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.