Legal Opinion

McInnes v. Sutton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1904No. 5024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered June 16, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a hearing before the court without a jury, dismissing a petition to vacate a judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Respondent brought suit for damages against appellant, and charged wanton injury and destruction of property of the respondent. Issue was formed, a trial was had, and a verdict returned against appellant. With the general verdict, a special one was returned by way of answer to submitted interrogatories. The defendant moved for a new trial, and also moved for judgment in his favor on the special findings of the jury. The latter motion was denied, but the motion for new trial was granted. The cause oame on for trial a second time in pursuance of regular assignment, the plaintiff -with his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Rio Grande Irrigation & Colonization Co. v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Kuhn v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Friedman v. ManleyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Greene v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bjurstrom v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Jones v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Odom v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sound Investment Co. v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Linn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API