People ex rel. Coon v. Plymouth Plank Road Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Information in tlie nature of a Quo Warranto.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, J:
Tlie motion for a new trial in this cause is denied. If good cause for a new trial existed, tlie motion should hayo been made at tlie last term; the report having been on file considerably more than a month before that term closed.' But wo think no good cause existed. What is relied upon is, that the attorney for respondents, upon whom they depended for the trial of tlie case, was unable from illness to attend to it when the trial took place, and therefore formally withdrew from the case, serving a written notice thereof *250upon counsel for tho people, who nevertheless wont on with tho…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Hendry v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Linn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- McInnes v. SuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. BruinsmaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Van Cott v. WallUtah Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.