Legal Opinion

Armas v. Armas

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1922No. Civ. No. 2418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The parties to this action (brothers), on the twenty-sixth day of December, 1919, entered into a written agreement of lease, whereby the defendant leased to the plaintiff forty acres of land, situated in what is designated in the lease as “Rotterdam Colony,” in Merced County, for the term of five years, for the total rental of $1,250, payable annually in installments of $250, the initial payment of $250 to be made and the same was made on the date of the execution of the lease. Among the covenants or conditions of the lease was the following:

“In the event the lessor shall sell and convey said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diepenbrock v. LuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Foley v. ConstantinoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gross v. HazeltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Mollet v. CasteelOregon Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API