Legal Opinion

Mollet v. Casteel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1970Published

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff lessees recovered a judgment for the cost of working and seeding land owned by the defendant lessor. The defendant appeals.

The defendant leased farm land to the plaintiffs for a term of seven years. The plaintiffs were to work the soil and purchase and grow grass seed, all at plaintiffs’ expense. The rent was to be one-third of the yearly crop. The lease provided:

“Should the within demised premises be sold by first party [lessor] prior to the expiration of the term herein, then and in that event, the first party shall pay to second parties [lessees] the prevailing rate for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garetson v. HesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Stewart v. PierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Armas v. ArmasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API