L'Hommedieu v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.
The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the court below, filed their complaint in three paragraphs. The first and second were for the recovery of the possession of real property, and the third a paragraph to quiet title to the same real estate.
One of the appellees filed a disclaimer, another filed an answer in two paragraphs, and all the rest pleaded the general denial only.
There was a trial by the court and a finding and judgment for the appellees.
The only error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial.
The appellees file a third brief, which is of recent date, when we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Avery v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Roots v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Utterback v. TerhuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. Portsmouth Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mayer v. HaggertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Habig v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Davis v. LennenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.