Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Haggerty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1894No. 16,834PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

This suit was brought by appellee, Haggerty, against Anton Mayer, in which plaintiff claimed an one-third interest in certain lands for partition. The lands had belonged to Haggerty, and were sold in 1878 by his assignee in bankruptcy, to appellant. Before the sale, the appellee had a wife, who, he claimed, inherited the undivided one-third part thereof under the statute. The wife died prior to the sale, and the appellee asserts title by descent from her.

The appellant, after purchasing the interest from the assignee, claims to have purchased the remaining interest by sale on execution issued…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Gray v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Joyce v. WhitneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Chissom v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Fleenor v. DriskillIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. City of Ferguson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Blakely Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Reynolds Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Pottlitzer v. Citizens Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Woodsmall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API