Legal Opinion
C.D.S., Inc. v. Village of Gates Mills
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 1986No. 85-1299PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue before us is whether a provision in a charter municipality’s Zoning Code, intended to protect a permitted nonconforming use, should be interpreted to prevent enforcement of a valid health, safety and welfare regulation in the municipality’s Fire Prevention Code. For the reasons to follow we hold for the municipality and reverse the appellate court decision.
I
The appellate court construed the off-street parking requirements contained in Chapter 923 of the Fire Prevention Code in pari materia with Chapters 711 and 715 of the Zoning Code to prevent enforcement of the Fire Prevention…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Kettering v. Lamar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Northern Ohio Sign Contractors Ass'n v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Key Ads, Inc. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- City of Wooster v. Entertainment One, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Verbillion v. Enon Sand & Gravel, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.