Legal Opinion
City of Wooster v. Entertainment One, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 21, 2004No. 03CA0043PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Batchelder, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellants, Eric Boron, Entertainment One of Pennsylvania, Inc., and E.V.B., Inc. (collectively, “Erotica”), appeal from the decision of the Wayne County Court of Common Pleas. We affirm.
I
{¶ 2} The instant matter involves the city of Wooster’s enactment of amendments to its zoning code regarding the zoning regulation of sexually oriented businesses. The change in the zoning ordinances affected Boron’s use of certain real property that he owned, and resulted in the underlying action and present appeal.
{¶ 3} On May 20, 2002, Boron, as the agent of E.V.B., Inc., entered…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Stotts v. PiersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Stumpff v. Riverside Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Bierleinl v. Grandview Hts. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Fonce v. KabinierOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.