Legal Opinion

Rogers v. McLeskey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1932No. 7 Div. 85PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question of fact before the court, and determined adversely to petitioner, appellant here. was whether Sarah Rogers was the widow of decedent.

The judgment was final against petitioner, and she was taxed with the costs; said judgment was appealable. Section 6114, Code; De Graffenried v. Breitling, 192 Ala. 254, 68 So. 265; Awbrey v. Estes, 216 Ala. 66, 112 So. 529.

The right of homestead and exemption by the alleged widow of decedent, after she had filed an alleged dissent as widow from the will, was the question of fact presented. Appellant's counsel reduce the issues to this: Petitioner…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Drawdy v. HestersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Beggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Moore v. HeinekeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Piel v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Davis v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Ex Parte CreelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Town of York v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API