Legal Opinion

Hales v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 18, 1991No. 65031PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is an appeal by the landowners (Michael S. Hales and Marlene S. Hales) from the entry of summary judgment in favor of The City of Kansas City, Kansas (The City). The trial court held the limitation of access to one-half of the landowners’ property is an exercise of police power for which no compensation is payable.

This matter arose as the result of The City preventing northbound traffic on Rainbow Boulevard from making a left turn into the south parking lot of the landowners’ apartment complex and preventing traffic leaving the same…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Smith v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Hudson v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. McCall Service Stations, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. City of Wichita v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Kau Kau Take Home No. 1 v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Eberth v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API