Legal Opinion
Spengler v. Worthington Cylinders
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2010No. 08-3110PublishedCited by 163 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Worthington Cylinders appeals the district court’s denial of its Rule 50(b) motion and the jury verdict rendered in favor of Plaintiff Jon Spengler, who sued Defendant alleging age discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Ohio’s anti-discrimination statute, Ohio Rev.Code § 4112.02. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Defendant’s Rule 50(b) motion and the jury’s damages awards.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Defendant Worthington Cylinders manufactures…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- Harold Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Stansberry v. Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Sheryl Taylor v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Marla Montell v. Diversified Clinical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Breed LogisticsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.