Legal Opinion
Harold Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2012No. 10-2418PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.
Harold Wasek claims that he was harassed and bullied while working for his employer, Arrow Energy Services, Inc. He cannot show, however, that the bullying and harassment occurred because of his gender. As such, Wasek cannot maintain an action under either Title VII or Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“EL-CRA”). Thus, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Arrow Energy.
I
Arrow Energy is in the business of servicing oil wells and has approximately thirteen active rigs and eighty hourly employees throughout Michigan,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- John B. Johnson v. University of Cincinnati, Joseph A. Steger, and Donald C. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Chazz Roberts v. Glenn Industrial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Eric Kuhn v. Washtenaw CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Theresa Waldo v. Consumers Energy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Redlin v. Grosse Pointe Pub. Sch. Sys.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.