Legal Opinion
Oregon Environmental Council v. Kunzman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 30, 1983No. 82-3232PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
The United States and Oregon Departments of Agriculture announced plans to spray a 6,400 acre area of South Salem, Oregon with a pesticide containing the chemical carbaryl in order to combat an infestation of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar). Residents of South Salem and two environmental groups then filed this action to prevent the aerial spraying. They sought relief against the federal defendants under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 702 and 706 (1976), and under several statutes and regulations that they alleged to have been violated: the National…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- G.S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. v. Kalitta Flying Service, Inc. Connie Kalitta Services, Inc. Conrad A. KalittaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Oregon Environmental Council v. KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Save Our Ecosystems v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Keaukaha-Panaewa Community Association v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Geophysical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.