Oregon Environmental Council v. Kunzman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, we review (1) a ruling that an environmental impact statement (“EIS”) for an insecticide spraying program to combat infestations of gypsy moths satisfies the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4332(C) (1982), and its implementing regulations, 40 C.F.R. §§ 1500-1508 (1986), and (2) the denial of attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (Supp.III 1985), for certain parts of this litigation. We affirm on the adequacy of the EIS. On the attorneys’ fees issues, we…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Heckler v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Idaho Conservation League v. MummaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Roland C. Dubois and Restore: The North Woods v. United States Department of Agriculture, and Loon Mountain Recreation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Bay Area Peace Navy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.