Save Our Ecosystems v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases challenge the spraying of herbicides on United States Forest Service (USFS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands. Both cases involve whether research on and disclosure of the potential carcinogenic, teratogenic and mutagenic effects of the herbicides is required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4331-4335 (1976) (NEPA).
The district court enjoined portions of both the BLM spraying program for the Eugene District of Oregon in Save Our Ecosystems v. Clark (SOS) and the USFS program for the State…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Scientists' Institute for Public Information, Inc. v. Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Animal Defense Council v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Thomas v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Washington Toxics Coalition v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Friends of the Earth v. HintzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.