Legal Opinion
Poole v. United States Government printing/publishing office/agency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 30, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0494PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Pro se Plaintiffs are sixteen black employees of the United States Government Publishing Office. They allege that after filing race-discrimination complaints with the Equal Opportunity Office, GPO supervisors made racial comments, removed equipment from Plaintiffs’ section, and took actions to make their workplace less safe. They thus brought this suit under Title YII alleging both retaliation and a hostile work environment. Defendant now moves to dismiss on a variety of grounds. Because Plaintiffs’ allegations are rather vague…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Poole v. United States Government printing/publishing office/agencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Redding v. MattisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Dash v. Meridian Public Charter SchoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Dunn v. McDonoughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Farrar v. RourkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.