Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1940No. 2075PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
On October 2, 1924, the heirs of Ruth Goodeagle, acting pursuant to the Act of March 3, 1921, 41 Stat. 1225, 1249, entered into a written lease with George W. Moore, whereby they leased a restricted Quapaw allotment to Moore for mining purposes for the term of ten years from October 2, 1924, and for such additional period as lead and zinc minerals should be found therein in paying quantities. The lease was duly approved by the Secretary of the In*192terior. It provided that the lessee should at all times conduct the mining operations in a workmanlike manner; that they…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- American Surety Co. of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Clark v. Service Auto Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Terry v. CrosswyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- M. Karam & Sons Mercantile Co. v. SerranoArizona Supreme Court · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sessions, Inc., a California Corporation v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Garr-Woolley v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- Statex Petroleum v. Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Denny Wiekhorst Equipment, Inc. v. Tri-State Outdoor Media Group, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.