Legal Opinion

Garr-Woolley v. Martin

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1978No. 50020PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOX, Presiding Judge.

An appeal from a replevin cause of action in which appellant, the partnership of Garr-Woolley, sought to recover equipment and machinery used in the production of oil and gas located upon the land of James and Judy Martin, appellees. The parties will be referred to as appellant and appellees.

Appellant, as lessee, entered into an oil and gas lease with appellees’ predecessor in title on February 7, 1958. The lease term was for three years and as long thereafter as oil or gas was produced. Under the terms of the lease, appellant was given the right to remove all machinery…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shellar v. ShiversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Spies v. DemayoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Terry v. CrosswyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Michaels v. PontiusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Hill v. Larcon CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. H.J. Freede Josephine W. Freede Roger S. Folsom and Mary M. Folsom v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Edmund F. Gutierrez, Mildred J. Gutierrez and Larry G. Gabel v. Edward Mike Davis, Individually and D/B/A Tiger Oil Company, and Tiger Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. McCraw Oil Co., Inc. v. PierceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. O'Brien Oil, L.L.C. v. NormanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Santa Fe Minerals v. SanfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API