Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. of New York v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1940No. 2026PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

The United States brought this suit against Andrew P. Gunther and the American Surety Company of New York 1 to recover royalties due under a lease on certain coal lands of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Indian Tribes situated in Le Flore County, Oklahoma.

The land covered by the lease was set aside by the Atoka Agreement, Act of June 28, 1898, 30 Stat. 495, 505, as the common property of the members of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Tribes. Pursuant to the Act of March 4, 1913, 37 Stat. 1007, and-the rules'and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior thereunder,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Grommes v. St. Paul Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Paterson v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTECITO UNION SCH. DIST.California Court of Appeal · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API