Legal Opinion

University of Arizona v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1983No. 16501-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

From an award of unscheduled disability benefits rendered by an administrative law judge, the claimant’s employer and the State Compensation Fund appealed to the Court of Appeals, Division I, which set aside the award in a memorandum decision filed 8 January 1983. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

We granted the claimant’s petition for review to determine whether her testimony and the testimony of her former treating physician were sufficiently substantial to sustain an award for an unscheduled disability.

The facts necessary to determine this issue are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Condon v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bratz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Tartaglia v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API