Legal Opinion
Tartaglia v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 9, 1993No. 2 CA-IC 91-0037PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Petitioner/employee Pete Tartaglia seeks review of the Administrative Law Judge’s (AU) decision that he had not been incapacitated for a period of time sufficient to meet the threshold requirement of A.R.S. § 23-1062(B).
Petitioner, a truck driver, suffered an industrial injury to his right eye on July 2, 1990. He was treated that evening at a hospital emergency room. On July 3, he was seen by an ophthalmologist who placed him in a non-work status. On July 10, the doctor released petitioner to return to work with the restriction that he not drive. On August 7, petitioner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Phoenix v. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tartaglia v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1994