Legal Opinion
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 5, 2010No. 2009-1241PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (“Philips”) appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington’s sua sponte dismissal of Philips’ civil suit against Cardiac Science Operating Co. (“Cardiac Science”). Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146, Philips sought review in the district court of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences’ (the “Board”) interference decision. Philips timely appealed the district court’s order dismissing Philips’ complaint with prejudice. We reverse and remand with instructions as outlined below.
BACKGROUND
Philips is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Becky Lynn Massey v. Del Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Blue Calypso, LLC. v. Groupon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. AOL, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Shum v. Intel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. TroyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Abbott GmbH & Co. v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.