Legal Opinion
Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Troy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 6, 2011No. 2011-1002, 2011-1003PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Atlantic Research appeals from the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts invalidating claims 31-36 of U.S. Reissue Patent No. 39,465 (“'465 patent”) for failing to meet the written description and best mode requirements. Because the district court did not err in invalidating these claims on written description grounds, we affirm. We decline to address the best mode issue.
Additionally, Stephen P. Troy, Jr. and Troy Industries, Inc. (collectively, “Troy”) cross-appeal from the district court’s denial of the following…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Protection Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Scriptpro LLC v. Innovation Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Ferring B v. v. Allergan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.