Legal Opinion
Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 28, 1997No. 95-572PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Plaintiff Hinesburg Sand and Gravel Company appeals a decision of the Chittenden Superior Court, which dismissed its civil rights action against defendants State of Vermont, and Patrick Garahan, Secretary of the Agency of Transportation, 2 concluding that plaintiff lacked standing to bring the action. We affirm.
Plaintiff supplies crushed and uncrushed gravel for use as a sub-base material to builders of state and local roads who bid on road projects in accordance with state bid specifications. Gravel is the result of natural forces and consists of varying sizes of loose rock. It is different…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Bischoff v. BletzSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Verizon Wireless Barton PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Brigham v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Kirk Wool v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.