Hudson v. Grace
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
While no case is reported in Pennsylvania with the same factual situation as that which gave rise to the present litigation, there is not involved here the appli cation of any new doctrine in tlie law of negligence. Human life is so complex that the circumstances attending the happening of different accidents are correspondingly varied, but the principle which determines the imposition of liability is simple and constant, being based on the proposition that one who, by sub-standard conduct, causes injury to another is legally responsible therefor if the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- MacDougall v. Penna. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Oviatt, Administrator v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Pennsylvania R. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Bonner v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Kemp v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Timmons v. ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Murphy v. Penn Fruit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Feld v. MerriamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.