Legal Opinion
United States v. Pellmann
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 10, 2012No. 10-3626PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONLEY, District Judge.
Roger A. Pellmann was convicted by a jury of (1) distributing fentanyl, a Schedule II narcotic controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and (2) obtaining morphine by misrepresentation, fraud, and deception in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(3). On appeal, Pellmann argues that his conviction should be overturned because the government failed to introduce expert testimony to prove that he distributed Schedule II narcotics outside of his professional practice and for other than legitimate medical purposes. Pellmann also maintains that the district court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Jerry L. WordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Herman Hicks, Radar Tyler, and Driefus HarbinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jeffrey StevensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Guillermo BallezaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Jeanette GrigsbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Andrew Dollard v. Gary WhisenandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. SabeanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Naeem KohliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. MbayeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.