Legal Opinion
United States v. Herman Hicks, Radar Tyler, and Driefus Harbin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 21, 2004No. 03-1838, 03-1849, 03-1878PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Herman Hicks, Radar Tyler, and Driefus Harbin of, among other offenses, conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and conspiring to distribute more than fifty grams of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). In this consolidated appeal, all three defendants contest the sufficiency of the conspiracy evidence against them and the district court’s decision to allow various acts of violence, including murders, into evidence as support for the government’s conspiracy theory. Harbin also challenges his sentence, alleging that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Abraham HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Ruben PulidoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. William G. Curtis and Jamell L. RousonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Anthony Thompson, Stephanie Johnson, Anthony D. SpradleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Eliseo ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Rodney McLee and Vicki Murph-JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Reyes Carrillo, Pedro Herrera, and Maria MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. ColonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Ulice AskewCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.